Landscape composition is challenging. Nature presents all of itself, from east to west, completely unedited. More often than not, we have to don our Warrior Composer gear and be ready to radically select. In this short demo, I intentionally chose a rather poor photo to show that, with specific compositional choices, I can make an otherwise boring and static composition into something that might be a starting point for a plein air painting.
Original source photo
The original scene captures the expansiveness of the fields, but in its “uncropped” state it is overly horizontal. The horizon line is also in the middle, which gives equal weight to the land and the sky. This makes the composition unfocused. What’s the picture about?
There are several good spatial cues I can try to accentuate:
- the vertical post in the middle
- the diagonal furrow in the foreground where the crops meet the grass
- the trees on the right
- the sliver of the Skagit River, just below the trees, which tapers in linear perspective toward the center
Every compositional choice I make will aim to bring greater movement and depth to the picture. I’ll impose a limited focus, choose a land- or sky-domiant composition, and slightly shift the position of an element.
OPTION 1 – Sky Dominant
The first act of composition for every landscape painter is to apply a limited focus. “To eliminate the unnecessary so the necessary may speak,” said Hans Hoffman. Here, a limited focus reduces the excessive horizontality of the scene that makes it appear so unfocused. In a sky-dominant composition the sky appears more expansive compared to the land, fostering the impression that the horizon is at a great distance. This choice alone begins to create a sense of depth. The visual cues that suggest depth — the tree, the posts, and the river — are too far apart. By sliding the trees over to the left, I bring them much closer to the vertical posts. (I’m not a strong proponent of redesigning landscape space, but easy moves like sliding a tree over or increasing its height are within my comfort zone.) Now the posts, the trees, and the river are close enough together to heighten the perspective forming at the center (indicated by the dotted lines). These diagonal movements interrupt the sheer horizontality that was so present in the original.
OPTION 2 – Land Dominant
Here, by lowering my view and raising the horizon line, I create a land-dominant composition. This offers a larger foreground, which has the potential to carry the viewer’s eye across a greater length of space — especially if there are spatial cues in the foreground that imply recession. The furrow in the foreground, where the crops meet the grass, forms a diagonal that carries our eye back in a zig-zag fashion.
Diagonals are perhaps the most effective means of implying movement and recession. This solution speaks to the power of foregrounds — when populated with the proper cues — to create strong entries into the space.
Both the sky- and land-dominant compositions are big improvements. Each adds an essential ingredient in landscape composition — variation. When the two primary masses within the composition have different visual weights, greater interest is created. Add to that, an emphasis on the perspective cues that suggest recession, and I have taken an unfocused, overly horizontal composition and given myself a potential starting point.
from Landscape Painting: Essential Concepts and Techniques for Plein Air and Studio Practice:
Limited Focus through Selection, pages 86-87
Placement of the horizon line, pages 92-93
The foreground challenge, 96